Evaluation Criteria for (GP)
The GP is evaluated on the basis of the written report and a defense. However, even an excellent defense will not be enough to compensate for a poorly written report, while excellent quality work will not be much downgraded by a more or less successful defense.
To clarify what constitutes a rating for a (GP), here is a non-exhaustive list of the criteria that the evaluators usually use, either consciously or unconsciously.
These criteria are grouped into 3 categories according to whether they relate to:
• the METHOD on which the work is based,
• the theoretical and practical content of the report,
• the form of the written report.
A. Evaluation of the method
Here are some of the key criteria for the method. Check that your written report satisfies each of these points:
• Is the research process and its steps clearly described?
• Is the research methodology justified in relation to the subject?
• Does the collection of data meet the appropriate scientific criteria?
• Are the sources of information well identified and verifiable?
• Are the analytical tools adequate for the data?
B. Evaluation of Content
The second aspect on which your (GP) will be judged is on the content of the written report. Do the exercise yourself to appreciate your work before you file it, by answering the following questions:
C. Evaluation of Form
Ask yourself if your (GP) meets each of these criteria and if it does not, review it before handing it over to your advisor for evaluation.
The GP is evaluated on the basis of the written report and a defense. However, even an excellent defense will not be enough to compensate for a poorly written report, while excellent quality work will not be much downgraded by a more or less successful defense.
To clarify what constitutes a rating for a (GP), here is a non-exhaustive list of the criteria that the evaluators usually use, either consciously or unconsciously.
These criteria are grouped into 3 categories according to whether they relate to:
• the METHOD on which the work is based,
• the theoretical and practical content of the report,
• the form of the written report.
A. Evaluation of the method
Here are some of the key criteria for the method. Check that your written report satisfies each of these points:
• Is the research process and its steps clearly described?
• Is the research methodology justified in relation to the subject?
• Does the collection of data meet the appropriate scientific criteria?
• Are the sources of information well identified and verifiable?
• Are the analytical tools adequate for the data?
B. Evaluation of Content
The second aspect on which your (GP) will be judged is on the content of the written report. Do the exercise yourself to appreciate your work before you file it, by answering the following questions:
C. Evaluation of Form
Ask yourself if your (GP) meets each of these criteria and if it does not, review it before handing it over to your advisor for evaluation.
.................................................................................................................................
By Public Administration
GP: Graduation project
GP: Graduation project
0 Comments:
Post a Comment